Heavy Metals in Chocolate: How to Eat This Superfood Safely (Updated October 2024)
Written by:
Maia James
With research provided by Michael Hopkins, PhD
Rich in polyphenols, the best dark chocolate deserves its “superfood” designation. I turned to Dr. Michael Hopkins to help me sort through the alarming headlines–and to see if there is a way to enjoy chocolate safely!
The 2024 Update on Heavy Metals in Dark Chocolate
It’s now been over a year since we published our take on the alarming Consumer Reports exposé, which called out several major chocolate suppliers for unacceptable levels of heavy metals in their products. In July, new study came out in Frontiers in Nutrition, renewing interest in the topic, and many readers curious about what, if anything, they should know about the new data.
To begin with, let’s go over the article by Hands and colleagues out of The George Washington University that has sparked fresh concern on this topic. In short, the report provides data on heavy metal contamination in cocoa-containing products, including dark chocolate, across four distinct batches from 2014 to 2022. A quick search on the topic will bring up a dozen or more press-releases and blog posts, all of which contain virtually identical copy regarding the key findings, which look something like this:
- 43% of the tested products exceeded the Prop 65 limits* for lead, and 35% exceeded the limits for cadmium, while no products exceeded the limits for arsenic.
- “Organic” products were found to have higher levels of both lead and cadmium compared to non-organic products.
- While median concentrations of heavy metals were below Prop 65 maximum allowable dosage, certain products still pose a risk if consumed frequently or in combination with other sources of heavy metals.
- Most products (97.2%) fell below the U.S. FDA’s interim reference levels (IRLs**) for lead, suggesting that the overall risk may be limited
*If you’re not familiar with Prop 65, it refers to more stringent criteria enforced in California to reduce heavy metal content in consumer products.
** Interim reference levels refers to the fact that these are set by the FDA as temporary/subject to change while more scientific data is being gathered on the health/safety consequences of lead exposure at varying levels.
Whatever media outlet or blogger you choose to click on from the search results page, their conclusion will be some version of the following: “The study highlights the ongoing issue of heavy metal contamination in chocolate products and suggests that more awareness is needed regarding potential risks, especially for certain products.”
While this information is factually correct, it’s not particularly constructive or helpful in choosing the best dark chocolate treat the next time you’re checking out in the grocery line.
Now that we’ve read the full journal article, we understand a few reasons that all the websites have released the same relatively unhelpful recap, as well as some unfortunate shortcomings within the conclusions noted above:
- The authors do not disclose any of the specific brands or products they tested, so there’s virtually no information in the study to help readers to make informed purchasing decisions based on the findings. This isn’t a shortcoming from a scientific standpoint, just a limitation on what can be done with the data.
- There are two notable issues with the conclusions that are worth mentioning because they open the door for misinterpretation of the data. First, the authors note that the results are greatly skewed by a few outlier products with high heavy metal concentrations, which distorts the overall averages and makes the summary statistics less informative for assessing the risk across most chocolate products. Perhaps even more relevant for consumers shopping in 2024, the conclusions drawn from the study fail to separate the most recent test results from samples taken in 2014. This is problematic because several chocolate producers have made efforts in recent years to reduce heavy metal contamination, and/or have become more transparent in their labeling, especially since the big whistle-blower Consumer Report came out at the end of 2022. The data from samples taken 10 and 8 years ago is virtually irrelevant for shoppers today, and their most recent sample batch doesn’t address any dark chocolate on the market since 2022.
The bottom line: Although this new study was just released and made a splash in the media, it doesn’t really add anything meaningful to the conversation from a consumer standpoint.
Please see below for the original post, and our updated recommendations for which brands have stepped up and are delivering on making sure their chocolate products are safe and healthy in 2024.
Cocoa Versus Cacao
You’ve probably seen the word “cacao” when reading ingredient labels, and other times you’ve seen “cocoa.” The difference is actually pretty simple: cacao refers to the raw, unprocessed bean, and that becomes cocoa once it is roasted and otherwise processed.
Sometimes, labels will use the phrase “cocoa beans” rather than cacao, but these are functionally interchangeable.
When you see “cocoa” on a label, that often means there is added sugar or milk. You’ll want to look closer at these products to see if the cocoa is actually just roasted cacao or if there are added ingredients.
Heavy Metals in Chocolate
The two toxins flagged in the report were cadmium and lead. Dr. Hopkins’ research uncovered several important details about the source of these heavy metals in chocolate.
- Chocolate manufacturing operations are not the source of heavy metals in chocolate products. Non-cacao based ingredients used in chocolate formulations are not a significant source of cadmium or lead. In other words, the metals are coming from the cacao bean itself–more specifically from milled cacao nibs, which are the de-shelled portion of a cacao bean. The conversation is centered around dark chocolate, rather than chocolate more generally, because the former is high in cacao compared to the latter. Dark chocolate ranges anywhere from about 60% to 90% cacao by volume.
- This issue is not new; it’s something chocolate manufacturers have been struggling with for years. As You Sow, a nonprofit organization that promotes corporate social responsibility, has been independently testing chocolate for heavy metals and releasing their results since 2014. The study released by Consumer Reports in December of 2022 came on the heels of a four-years-long investigation by an expert committee. Their report explores how these heavy metals end up in chocolate products and ways to prevent such contamination.
- Europe has clear policies and limits on the presence of heavy metals in food, but the United States does not. The FDA has yet to establish specific limits on heavy metal contamination in finished food products– limits only exist for bottled water.
How Lead & Cadmium Get Into Chocolate
As mentioned above, cadmium and lead contamination are not the result of chocolate manufacturing processes. Each metal gets into the finished product through different means–and therefore the solutions to reduce each toxic metal differ.
Cadmium is taken up from the soil by the roots of cacao trees and transported into the beans. (This is similar to the way in which various heavy metals end up in rice and root vegetables, an issue that has also received a lot of attention in recent years.)
Over time, steps can be taken to reduce cadmium levels in soil, as well as prevent uptake of the heavy metals by plant roots. In the near term, experts conclude that remediation of the soil itself to reduce cadmium isn’t practical at scale. Therefore, the “only feasible strategy” provided by the panel of experts is for manufacturers to mix high cadmium cocoa with lower cadmium cocoa to bring down the concentration in the finished product.
As for lead, this metal makes its way into the cacao after it’s been harvested, during the handling of the wet beans.Fresh cacao beans are very sticky. After being removed from their pods, they must be fermented and dried. During this phase, the beans can come into contact with soil via direct contact with the ground or exposed surfaces like open patios, drying tables, plastic tarps, and bags/drying containers. Particles are also deposited on the wet beans from dust in the air, which may contain high concentrations of lead from exhaust produced by nearby equipment or automobiles.
Since lead contamination happens after harvesting, chocolate producers have more control in its prevention. Experts suggest that manufacturers work with cacao farmers to implement practices that reduce wet cacao bean contact with soil or environmental dust particles.
Which Chocolate Brands Are the Best & Worst?
The 2022 Consumer Reports study tested 28 dark chocolate bars for lead and cadmium. They used California’s maximum allowable dose levels for lead (0.5 mcg) and cadmium (4.1 mcg) to highlight the best and worst brands, which were as follows.
The brands found to have the lowest levels of heavy metal contamination were:
- Mast Organic Dark Chocolate (80% cacao)
- Taza Organic Chocolate (70% cacao)
- Ghirardelli Intense Dark Chocolate/Twilight Delight (86% and 72% cacao, respectively)
- Valrhona Abinao Dark Chococlate (85% cacao)
- Villakuyaya Organic Dark Chocolate Single Origin (up to 100% cacao)
The brands that were found to have the highest levels of heavy metal contamination were:
- Theo Organic Pure Dark/Extra Dark (70% and 85% cocoa, respectively)
- Trader Joe’s Dark Choc Lover’s (85% cocoa)
- Lily’s Extremely Dark (85% cocoa)
- Green & Black’s Organic Dark Chocolate (70% cocoa)
Our Top Picks for Dark Chocolate
In our original post, we selected Mast, Taza and Villakuyaya as our three top picks. Below we’ve expanded our recommended brands, after receiving verification of quality assurance testing that meets our standards.
Good Stuff: Chocolate Brands with Third-party testing
Alter Eco Deep Dark Blackout
- Percentage Dark – 85%
- Fair Trade and Organic
- Vegan, GMO free, Gluten free, Soy free, Corn Free, Recyclable packaging
Ingredients: Classic Blackout 85%: *Organic cacao beans, *organic cocoa butter, *organic raw cane sugar, *organic vanilla beans
Mast Chocolate
- Percentage Dark – 50%, 70% & 80%
- Fair Trade and Organic
- Non-GMO, Vegan, Kosher, gluten free,
Ingredients: Organic Dark 80%: Organic cacao, organic cane sugar, organic vanilla bean. May contain traces of tree nuts and sesame seeds
Spring & Mulberry
- Percentage Dark – 72%
- Direct Trade and Organic
- Sweetened with dates instead of sugar.
Ingredients: Pure Dark 72%: Organic cocoa beans, organic dates, organic cocoa butter
Taza Wicked Dark Chocolate
- Percentage Dark – 95%
- Direct Trade Certified and Organic
- Have a Cacao Powder
- Non-GMO, Certified Gluten Free, and Kosher Pareve. It is also dairy free, soy free, and vegan.
Ingredients: 95% Wicked Dark: Organic Cacao Beans, Organic Cane Sugar. May Contain Traces of Tree Nuts and Sesame Seeds
Valrhona
- Percentage Dark – 39%-100%
- Fair Trade and Organic
- Have a Cacao Powder
- Kosher, ISO (Int’l) Several, V-label, many others- Certs are european
Ingredients: Tasting Bar Komuntu 80%:Cocoa beans, sugar, cocoa butter, vanilla. Lecithin (emulsifier)
Villakuyaya Chocolate
- Percentage Dark – 65%, 80%, 90%, 100%
- Fair Trade and Organic
- Vegan, Gluten Free, Kosher
- Have a Cacao Powder
Ingredients: Organic Dark 80% Pure: Organic Cacao beans (Arriba Nacional), organic cane sugar, organic cacao butter.
Viva Naturals Nibs
- Percentage Dark – 100%
- Organic
- Have a Cacao Powder
- Vegan, No Soy, Non-GMO, Kosher, GF
Ingredients: 100% organic cacao
Low-Metal Chocolate We Still Don’t Recommend
Ghirardelli (the same company that produces Lindt) was recommended in the CR report, but we would call this only Okay or Sneaky Stuff. They lack any certifications (including USDA organic), and contain an added binding agent–soy lecithin. Moreover, in our attempts to obtain confirmation regarding their quality assurance testing process, all we have received is a canned corporate statement referring us to a press release put out by the National Confectioner’s Association, along with the line “all other information you have requested is confidential at this time.”
How to Eat Chocolate Safely
In addition to choosing chocolate brands that have been shown to have lower levels of heavy metals, there are a few things you can do to reduce your exposure to cadmium and lead. Besides just avoiding dark chocolate, you can:
- Eat a diverse diet. Heavy metals are naturally occurring in many healthful foods like rice, sweet potatoes, carrots, and spinach. The key here is variety and balance rather than trying to eliminate all traces of these contaminants in our diet.
- Choose chocolate with lower cocao. Because this contamination comes from the cacao itself, you can choose dark chocolate with a lower percentage of cacao (60% dark, rather than 80%, for example) or choose milk chocolate.
- Still go for organic. Organic chocolate is not a quick fix to this particular issue because the requirements for USDA organic certification will not eliminate these contaminants. However, we still recommend going with organic when given the choice, especially when you start considering milk chocolate with a longer list of ingredients.
- Opt for African chocolate. The CR report states that soil cadmium levels are typically higher in cacao beans from South and Central America, and lower in cacao from western Africa. Unfortunately, most chocolate bars don’t tell you their cocao’s country of origin, but if they do, you can opt for African bars.
- Sign a petition. If you’d like to take action beyond your own grocery cart, Consumer Reports has launched a petition calling on several companies with unacceptable levels of heavy metal contamination to remedy the situation. You can also put pressure on the FDA to implement more regulation around the presence of heavy metals in the food supply by signing this petition.
Final Thoughts on Dark Chocolate
Cacao (and by extension, dark chocolate) is a rich source of antioxidants, minerals, and vitamins. While the heavy-metal contamination has come up in the news over the last two years, the problem is not in fact new. For most people who consume dark chocolate as an occasional treat, the levels of cadmium and lead exposure are not cause for panic. Still, we think it’s reasonable to avoid the brands highlighted as “worst” in the original report and instead choose one of the recommendations above.
Stay sane,
Maia & Michael
Note: This article contains affiliate links or sponsored content, which means that if you make a purchase, we may earn a commission. We only recommend products that meet our strict standards for non-toxicity and that we use (or want to use!) ourselves. Thank you so much for supporting the brands that make Good Stuff!
Enjoying this guide?
Join our list of 60K families who rely on our free guides covering everything from milk to mattresses! Plus get access to exclusive deals.
Related Posts
Which Are the Healthiest Eggs (for you, the chickens, and the planet)?
The Healthiest Organic Wine Brands We’ve Found (Updated 2024)
Why Is There Lead in Everything?
Toxins in Coffee: 7 Sources of Harmful Chemicals in Your Morning Brew (Updated 2024)
3 responses to “Heavy Metals in Chocolate: How to Eat This Superfood Safely (Updated October 2024)”
All well and good for chocolate bars, but what about contamination in cocoa powder which is used in smoothies?
Hello! Have you guys found a chocolate chip you feel is good stuff?
Hi Mriam,
Great question. Ghiardelli is one of the good ones and they make chocolate chips.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.